SafetyLitigation.com
content top

Punitive Damages Permissible In West Virginia Deliberate Intent Action But Only When “Specific Intent” Is Proven

While working on a pipeline, a worker was allegedly sprayed with dangerous chemicals that caused significant injuries.  He brought suit against a number of companies alleging damages from the exposure, the unsuccessful attempts to shower off the chemicals and decontaminate him, and inappropriate medical treatment.  Among the motions to dismiss filed, the U.S. District Court for the...

Safety Violation Upheld By Kentucky Court Where Injured Electrical Worker Not Wearing PPE And Tensioner Truck Not Grounded

The reconductoring process involves stringing new power lines alongside existing energized lines to avoid a power disruption.  During this process at a site in Meade County, Kentucky in 2009, while a worker was turning the winch on a tensioner mounted in a truck to increase the tension in a power line, the worker, who was not wearing any insulating personal protective equipment (PPE),...

Case Involving Miner’s Benefits Claim Not Precluded By Issues Decided In Widow’s Claim For Survivor’s Benefits

Last week, the Fourth Circuit denied a coal company’s petition for review of a Benefits Review Board decision that affirmed a grant of living miner benefits to a former employee under the Black Lung Benefits Act.  The company argued that the award should be vacated because the case was precluded by a previously adjudicated claim for survivor’s benefits by the miner’s widow, which was...

Strict Products Liability And Implied Warranty Of Merchantability Claims Allowed To Proceed Against Air Mattress Manufacturer And Retailer

The U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida denied a motion to dismiss a plaintiff’s strict products liability and implied warranty of merchantability claims against an air mattress manufacturer and the retailer from which the product was purchased.  The plaintiff was allegedly injured after his inflated air mattress unexpectedly popped and collapsed.  The defendants...

Indiana Federal Court Holds Insurer Does Not Have Duty To Indemnify Manufacturer’s Contamination Damages

An insurance dispute developed arising from alleged soil and groundwater contamination around an Indiana plant used to manufacture automotive component climate control system parts including radiators, condensers, hoses, compressors, accumulators, fuel injection components, and evaporators.  The aluminum from which the parts were made had to be cleaned, so the site operated 13...

Illinois Federal Court Denies Summary Judgment Motion Of Auto Hauling Rig Manufacturer On Product Liability, Negligence, And Punitive Damages Claims Under Kentucky Law

A man working as a car hauler was injured when he slipped and fell from the second tier of an auto hauling rig.  The rig had a “Canadian guardrail” installed, but had not been fitted with other safety features including grab bars, guard rails, or cat walks.  These features were installed on many older rigs through a retrofitting program as well as included on all newly-manufactured...

« Older Entries Next Entries »