SafetyLitigation.com
content top

Plaintiffs’ Product Liability Expert Opinions Scrutinized By Federal Courts

Yesterday, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee and the U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska issued opinions addressing challenges to proffered plaintiffs’ expert testimony in product liability cases.  In the Nebraska case, which involved injuries sustained from a fall off a ladder, the court excluded the plaintiff’s expert opinion that...

California Federal Court Prevents Product Liability Plaintiff From Changing Case Theory On Eve Of Trial

While installing an industrial switchboard, a California worker sustained serious injuries and brought suit against the switchboard manufacturer alleging defective design.  Under California law, a tort claim for strict liability based on design defect can proceed under two theories:  the risk-benefit test, which asks whether the benefits of the challenged design outweigh the risk of...

“Any Exposure” Asbestos Theory Rejected By Illinois Federal Court

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois will exclude the opinions of two proffered experts who were going to testify to the “Any Exposure” theory of asbestos exposure in a personal injury case.  That theory posits that any exposure to asbestos fibers at all constitutes an underlying cause of injury to the individual exposed.  In excluding the...

Indictments In West Virginia Water Contamination Case Reminder Of Potential Criminal Consequences

Six owners, managers, and employees of the company that owned the West Virginia storage facility that leaked chemicals into the Elk River and contaminated the Charleston area’s water supply in January 2014 were charged criminally yesterday with violations of the Clean Water Act.  The U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of West Virginia indicted four individuals for failing to...

Expert Opinion Properly Discounted When In Conflict With Federal Regulation In Mining Case

The Sixth Circuit denied a mining company’s petition for review in a black lung benefits case, holding that the ALJ had properly discounted the company’s expert’s opinion where it conflicted with relevant federal law.  The court also found that the ALJ properly weighed pulmonary function tests.  The mining company had challenged the ALJ’s underlying decision on both grounds. In the...

Verdict For Automotive Manufacturer Reversed Where Trial Judge Erred In Admitting Entire NHTSA Report

On Wednesday, the Court of Appeals of Missouri reversed a jury verdict in favor of an automotive manufacturer and remanded the case for a new trial.  In 2003, a Missouri state trooper was killed and a passenger in his car was severely injured when a truck driver veered onto the shoulder of the interstate and collided with the patrol car.  The fire began in the left rear fender, at the...

« Older Entries Next Entries »