SafetyLitigation.com
content top

Illinois Federal Court Holds Responsible Party Under Oil Pollution Act Does Not Have To Establish Actual Cause Of Incident To Obtain Limitation Of Liability

In January 2005, a barge exploded in the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal.  The explosion killed an employee of the barge owner and spilled 4,718 gallons of oil into the canal.  The insurers of the barge owner paid more than $8.6 million in costs associated with the removal effort and then sought to recover the costs from the Oil Pollution Act’s Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund through...

Senator Rockefeller Urges President To Have OMB Act On Crude-By-Rail Proposed Rulemaking

Earlier this week, U.S. Senator Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.), Chair of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, sent a letter to President Obama urging him to have the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) act on the Department of Transportation’s (DOT) proposed crude-by-rail rulemaking “as expeditiously and thoroughly as possible.”  Citing the disaster in...

Indiana Federal Court Holds Insurer Does Not Have Duty To Indemnify Manufacturer’s Contamination Damages

An insurance dispute developed arising from alleged soil and groundwater contamination around an Indiana plant used to manufacture automotive component climate control system parts including radiators, condensers, hoses, compressors, accumulators, fuel injection components, and evaporators.  The aluminum from which the parts were made had to be cleaned, so the site operated 13...

Payroll Taxes Not Properly Withheld From Jury Verdict For Railroad Worker According To Missouri Federal Court

Last Fall, a jury in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri awarded a railroad employee a verdict of nearly $1.7 million after a train “bottomed out” and ejected him.  Yesterday, the court had to determine whether the railroad properly withheld payroll taxes to be tendered to the U.S. Treasury from the amount of the verdict.  Specifically, was a general verdict...

Kansas Appellate Court Agrees That Independent Medical Examiner’s Report Was Properly Excluded After Improper Contact By Counsel

The Court of Appeals of Kansas affirmed a decision from the state’s Workers’ Compensation Board to exclude the testimony and report of an independent medical examiner as a sanction for the claimant’s counsel’s violation of a no-contact order.  The case involved a worker that performed maintenance for an aircraft company for 30-plus years and complained of multiple back injuries. ...

Illinois Federal Court Denies Summary Judgment Motion Of Auto Hauling Rig Manufacturer On Product Liability, Negligence, And Punitive Damages Claims Under Kentucky Law

A man working as a car hauler was injured when he slipped and fell from the second tier of an auto hauling rig.  The rig had a “Canadian guardrail” installed, but had not been fitted with other safety features including grab bars, guard rails, or cat walks.  These features were installed on many older rigs through a retrofitting program as well as included on all newly-manufactured...

« Older Entries Next Entries »